Mail Thread Index
- (1) ,
- (0) No Subject,
- (2) Welcome to the Java-OS/2 list!, Alex Stewart
- (2) os/2 porting mail list, Guy McIlroy
- (0) the list, Paul Hepworth
- (0) IBM? hahhaha! I say we do it anyway!, Paul Hepworth
- (0) Re: IBM? hahhaha! I say we do it anyway!, Guy McIlroy
- (0) Java port, quantum
- (0) IBM, OS/2, and Java, quantum
- (0) OJ, Philip R Brenan
- (1) Re: resend of some items you may have mi, Paul Hepworth
- (1) Re: resend of some items you may have mi, Paul Hepworth
- (1) large group, Paul Hepworth
- (0) OJ, Paul Hepworth
- (0) Re: Schedules&home pages, Paul Hepworth
- (0) os/2,pm client/server, humberto
- (0) Re: Schedules&home pages, Guy McIlroy
- (0) Re: OJ, Guy McIlroy
- (0) Re: OJ, Guy McIlroy
- (0) Re: OJ, Paul Hepworth
- (0) All in favour..., brucej
- (0) Notes for porters, brucej
- (1) Re: Notes for porters, Paul Hepworth
- (0) No Subject, Mark H. James
- (0) Porting issues, quantum
- (0) No Subject, Matthew Davi Barker
- (0) Re: Notes for porters, Guy McIlroy
- (0) Re: Porting issues, Guy McIlroy
- (1) Re: use of #ifdefs, jon seymour
- (0) No Subject, Angelos pampoukidis
- (0) No Subject, Rob Soosaar
- (1) pissing and moaning..., Paul Hepworth
- (0) Re: pissing and moaning..., Paul Hepworth
- (1) Code run-through meeting, John Rodley
- (0) Sun seminar, NYC 9/21, John Rodley
- (0) Re: Code run-through meeting, Paul Hepworth
- (1) Re: Code run-through meeting, Paul Hepworth
- (0) No Subject, bosch
- (1) DCE 2.1 for OS/2...use it for Java port?, RODRIGUES CRAIG J
- (0) Re: Code run-through meeting, Guy McIlroy
- (0) Re: opcodes.* (fwd), Philip R Brenan
- (2) Re: DCE 2.1 for OS/2...use it for Java p, Anil Thomas Maliyekkel
- (0) Re: DCE 2.1 for OS/2...use it for Java p, Guy McIlroy
- (0) Re: DCE 2.1 for OS/2...use it for Java p, Anil Thomas Maliyekkel
- (0) Re: Code run-through meeting, rdturner
- (1) Re: Code run-through meeting, Guy McIlroy
- (0) Re: Code run-through meeting, rdturner
- (1) Re: DCE 2.1 for OS/2...use it for Java p, Guy McIlroy
- (3) Re: DCE 2.1 for OS/2...use it for Java p, Guy McIlroy
- (0) Re: Best place to get GNU tools for OS/2, Howard Gilbert
- (0) Re: DCE 2.1 for OS/2...use it for Java p, Guy McIlroy
- (0) Re: Code run-through meeting, Paul Hepworth
- (0) Re: Code run-through meeting, Anil Thomas Maliyekkel
- (0) Re: Code run-through meeting, rdturner
- (0) Re: DCE 2.1 for OS/2...use it for Java p, Guy McIlroy
- (1) java and OS/2 GNU emx compiler,,, Asbjorn Pettersen
- (1) Volunteering for makefile conversion and, rdturner
- (0) No Subject, bosch
- (0) Code run-through, BRUCEJ
- (0) Re:IBM Betas, brucej
- (0) OS/2 Java Porting, Sean Kormilo
- (0) Re: java and OS/2 GNU emx compiler,,, bosch
- (0) Re:IBM Betas, Guy McIlroy
- (0) Re: DCE 2.1 for OS/2...use it for Java p, Guy McIlroy
- (0) Re: Volunteering for makefile conversion, Guy McIlroy
- (0) Re: Volunteering for makefile conversion, Brett Wooldridge
- (0) Re: Volunteering for makefile conversion, bosch
- (0) Re: Volunteering for makefile conversion, bosch
- (0) Re: Volunteering for makefile conversion, Paul Hepworth
- (0) EMX, JOlson
- (0) Re: EMX, Paul Hepworth
- (0) IBM Beta details, brucej
- (2) Java Future, JOlson
- (1) Re: Java Future, Anil Thomas Maliyekkel
- (0) 1st look at source, John Rodley
- (0) Re: Volunteering for makefile conversion, bosch
- (0) Rexx for Opcodes, Philip R Brenan
- (2) Re: Rexx for Opcodes, Brett Wooldridge
- (0) Rexx for makefiles, Philip R Brenan
- (0) Re: Rexx for Opcodes, Paul Hepworth
- (0) "The other porting effort", Paul Hepworth
- (0) Re: Rexx for Opcodes, Barry Pederson
- (0) OS/2 Port faq, steveb
- (1) Quiet lately, Paul Hepworth
- (0) Announce: OS/2 HotJava FTP site, bosch
- (0) No Subject, Jason Crawford tl 863-7569
- (1) Re: Quiet lately, Paul Hepworth
- (0) soot?! eek!, Paul Hepworth
- (0) Who has what?, bosch
- (1) javah, Philip R Brenan
- (0) absence, Alex Stewart
- (1) OS/2 port status?, Alex Stewart
- (0) ftp site, Paul Hepworth
- (0) OS/2 Port, b pesner
- (0) Re: OS/2 Port, ehalbert
- (0) Re: OS/2 Port, Tim Lindholm
- (0) Re: OS/2 port status?, bosch
- (0) Re: OS/2 Port, Paul Hepworth
- (1) FYI (Javah compile), Alex Stewart
- (0) Various, b pesner
- (0) OJ, Philip R Brenan
- (1) OJ - The missing routines., Philip R Brenan
- (2) OS/2 Port, b pesner
- (1) Re: OJ - The missing routines., bblair
- (0) Re: OJ - The missing routines., Tim Lindholm
- (1) getContext, Philip R Brenan
- (0) Re: getContext, Tim Lindholm
- (1) Re: getcontext (fwd), Philip R Brenan
- (1) Re: threads in Solaris, Mark H. James
- (0) OS/2 Java Porting Mailing List, Bruce Johnston/Prof of Comp Sci/Math Dept/UW-Stout
- (1) Re: OJ, bosch
- (0) Re: threads in Solaris, Paul Hepworth
- (0) Re: OS/2 Port, Anil Thomas Maliyekkel
- (0) register, Guy Lauriault,,,941-4902
- (1) Re: Java for OS/2 by IBM, ehalbert
- (2) Re: Java for OS/2 by IBM, ehalbert
- (1) Re: Java for OS/2 by IBM, ehalbert
- (0) Re: Java for OS/2 by IBM, Anil Thomas Maliyekkel
- (2) Re: Java for OS/2 by IBM, ehalbert
- (0) Mailing list archive is on the Web, bblair
- (0) Re: OJ, bosch
- (0) Re: threads in Solaris, bosch
- (0) Re: OS/2 Port, Guy Lauriault,,,941-4902
- (1) re: Re: OS/2 Port, Just a regular guy using OS/2
- (0) No Subject, Leonard Kesterson
- (0) 64-Bit arithmetic, b pesner
- (0) Re: OS/2 Port, Just a regular guy using OS/2
- (0) signoff, Erik Schumacher
- (0) No Subject, bentley
- (1) Progress on threads, Philip R Brenan
- (0) MIME messages decoded, Mark James
- (1) Re: MIME messages decoded, bosch
- (0) Re: Java for OS/2 by IBM, Sam Krishna
- (0) What's going on with Java for OS/2?, Bek Oberin
- (0) Re: What's going on with Java for OS/2?, bosch
- (0) Beta sources available!, Paul Hepworth
- (1) Re: Beta sources available!, bosch
- (0) Re: Re: Beta sources available!, Mark James
- (0) (no subject), rich
- (0) No Subject, Sandy Mustard
- (0) java, Greg Hutchison
- (1) Desperately seeking OJ, MIKEMULLER
- (0) Re: Desperately seeking OJ, Kris Kwilas
- (0) Re: Desperately seeking OJ, Kris Kwilas
- (0) Re: Desperately seeking OJ, brucej
- (0) Info for an FAQ, Mark James
- (0) re: desperately seeking oj, Michael.Warmuth
- (0) IBM's Java efforts..., COMITALE LEO
- (0) Re: Desperately seeking OJ, bosch
- (0) Why is Java non-portable? (fwd), Jochen Friedrich
- (0) Re: Desperately seeking OJ, MIKEMULLER
- (0) (no subject), Steve Benesko
- (0) suscribe, savardd
- (0) IBM's Java plans announced, Mark James
- (0) Re: IBM's Java plans announced, MIKEMULLER
- (1) Re: IBM's Java plans announced, bosch
- (0) Re: IBM's Java plans announced, Guy McIlroy
- (0) No Subject, egon
- (0) No Subject, Dave Hammond
- (0) Re: IBM's Java plans announced & oth, Joseph Phillps
- (0) Test, Dave Atherton
- (0) Re: IBM's Java plans announced & oth, bosch
- (0) No Subject, ehalbert
- (0) Re: IBM's Java plans announced & oth, MIKEMULLER
- (0) IBM releases beta JDK for OS/2!, Mark James
- (0) Re: IBM releases beta JDK for OS/2!, bosch
- (1) Re: IBM releases beta JDK for OS/2!, Paul Hepworth
- (0) Re: IBM releases beta JDK for OS/2!, Thomas Holaday
- (1) re: Re: IBM releases beta JDK for OS/2!, Just a regular guy using OS/2